Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hail of bombs imbalanced
#27
eSVau Wrote:
lyf590 Wrote:2 words: fly sidewayys!! Big Grin

Again a nice pictureTongue[attachment=0]

What so see on this picture:
  • 400 area circles of each cluster
  • time indices of each single cluster (asumed 0.2 seconds per cluster)
  • solid boundary of a blue circle whichs marks the movement area of a tank with 300 speed within a single second
  • blue dashed inner circle whichs marks the movement area of a tank with 300 speed within 0.4 seconds
  • red rectangle I would use as target area for a combo*

And yes, i'm still talking about combo because that combo is a way to asure a multiple hit. I would use a combo of aiming rocket + hail of bombs within the red marked area.
As a result of the aiming rocket my target tank would be stunned an the center line. At lvl 10 i can spend 4 points into aiming rocket, which means 1.2seconds stun. I asume a delay of one second between both skills.
Now, after stunning plus my asumed second delay between skills, i would hit my target after 1.4 till 1.6 seconds, that means 0.4 seconds to move around, which i have marked as blue dashed innner circle.

Yeah, it's a huge area not to be hit more than once</ironic> which criticise: multiple hits AND A COMBO ASURES MULTIPLE HITS SO YES I'M TALKING ABOUT A F*CKING COMBO

Now, i'm out - talking to a wall :lol:

1. Your 0.2 seconds per cluster are just wrong, I'm sure mappers can falsify that statement of yours. Even the first hit doesn't happen at 0 seconds (which is so obvious to see when you use it).
2. "As a result of the aiming rocket my target tank would be stunned an the center line" is just wrong. If you shoot rocket first: You completly forget about the time the rocket needs to get to the target. You lock the target for the ultimate to x,y by shooting the rocket at t, but when the rocket hits at t+n the target is allready at x+n,y+n. Just this position difference is enough to dodge any double hit in most cases as the rocket needs at least ~0.5 seconds to arrive at 1000 range (on lan).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Hail of bombs imbalanced - by griffin1987 - 2010-02-06, 17:59:10
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-06, 18:27:02
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Saiyuki - 2010-02-06, 18:30:45
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-06, 18:49:07
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Saiyuki - 2010-02-06, 19:00:13
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-06, 19:30:27
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-06, 20:19:56
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-06, 20:37:26
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Saiyuki - 2010-02-06, 21:11:04
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Paladon - 2010-02-06, 22:40:52
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Saiyuki - 2010-02-06, 22:46:07
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Paladon - 2010-02-06, 23:56:37
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-07, 00:08:12
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-07, 01:09:28
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-07, 01:17:02
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-07, 01:25:43
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-07, 01:42:41
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-07, 02:14:55
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Saiyuki - 2010-02-07, 02:39:27
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-07, 03:31:53
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-07, 05:48:15
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by lyf590 - 2010-02-07, 09:51:34
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by horselance - 2010-02-07, 12:15:24
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Exodus - 2010-02-07, 13:10:15
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-07, 14:33:34
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-07, 19:49:03
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-07, 20:12:20
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Exodus - 2010-02-07, 20:19:02
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-07, 20:31:40
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by GooglyBoogly - 2010-02-08, 00:41:16
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by muhaha96 - 2010-02-08, 01:04:32
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by jonjon - 2010-02-08, 01:52:54
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-08, 04:22:45
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by muhaha96 - 2010-02-08, 14:16:21
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-08, 15:49:49
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by khEg - 2010-02-08, 20:28:53
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-08, 20:35:45
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by lyf590 - 2010-02-09, 09:52:47
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Paladon - 2010-02-16, 12:44:50
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-16, 14:45:41
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-16, 15:03:01
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-16, 15:17:08
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Prog - 2010-02-16, 15:24:21
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by eSVau - 2010-02-16, 15:27:37
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Paladon - 2010-02-16, 16:17:41
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by griffin1987 - 2010-02-18, 16:40:13
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by griffin1987 - 2010-02-18, 16:43:00
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by Althend - 2010-02-18, 19:43:53
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by TKF - 2010-10-05, 14:06:19
Re: Hail of bombs imbalanced - by UnifiedDoom - 2010-10-05, 16:19:11

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Double Mech Still Imbalanced griffin1987 0 1,673 2011-11-19, 22:57:36
Last Post: griffin1987
  4 vs 5 --- 4 Player team imbalanced? StendekX 5 5,107 2010-12-06, 21:58:28
Last Post: mooneye
  No more Bombs in own base - why? griffin1987 15 7,489 2010-03-28, 17:11:50
Last Post: ssl
  Bombs die too easily. the truth 14 6,524 2009-02-08, 20:46:17
Last Post: Dr.McNinja
  I think the map is imbalanced in favor of Dark Force Khristophoros 28 10,927 2008-12-18, 05:28:36
Last Post: Khristophoros



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)