2012-11-28, 19:04:38
(2012-11-27, 12:46:27)eSVau Wrote:(2012-11-27, 08:05:01)dirtyterror Wrote: You will get mass leavers, sabotaging asshole, or any other type of annoying sh**t that will destroy the game. "No kick vote" wont change much in this matter.That a point i wont get: why do so many people even consider playing qualify instead of ranked, but thats another topic...
I think the only valid kick reasons besides being afk are mass flaming, insulting and destroying a game on purpose. The problem is we only can detect afk for sure.
I prefer tighter kick rules anyway. We have even to consider that kicking is a map feature which most maps do not have. So it's NOT part of the game. It is meant for special situations and anyone should reasonably use it.
Hmmm thats right (about that reasonable usage of kick vote) but moste of players in quals does not understand what should be the purpose or the reason of the kcik vote.
They think: ohh he have electro cannon, i suck now but with that weapon and hes gold i would be better!!! (the ones that know taht they can buy equip from yard cheaper) so he vote -yes, another think abut the gold only, third will type -yes only cause hes friend tould him to do it, and 4-th will vote and type same as the rest of team cause he does now know what its for and they tould him to do it.
50% qual games are mess and chaos. Moste of them end at min 20 cause of leavers, feeders, and so one. I think kick vote should not be alloved cause you cant control what players will do there, its even hard to predict what they do in terms of tactic

