(2013-11-14, 14:15:37)EarthR Wrote: @flygplan just your idea that mid is more important than lane tells a lot about your experience in this game. If you send a really weak player to lane he will lose it in 5-10 min and that will force his team in mid to stay at cp in order to help him protect it. Dont think for a second that a weak player can handle a lane. In the first 30 min of game lane domination may decide the outcome of the game.
Well I feel like I can lane succesful vs whoever who still play BT however right now I try to work on my mid game.
If you get a weak player on your team, you can't really expect to win vs good players, because if the weak player play on lane, that lane will be weak, if weak player play mid, mid will be weak.
However if I get to chose I would place the weak player on lane, my mid playstyle make me be close to my cp anyway so I can help defend the lane.
If weak player play mid I feel its good chance that the weak player make rest of the players to underpeform to which will very likley cost the game.
Losing lane or mid may cost the game however its very dependent how the enemies use it, the real threat are if they got straight for base after taking lane or mid.
Losing one or two factories = game lost most of the chases.
However because alot of players are so nice and just continue to play mid or other lane this seldom happens.
I rather lose a lane then lose the game because our mid is all crapp.[/b]