2013-11-28, 01:21:04
@Mynth : I wouldn't mind your biblical phylosophy if u said "what about we start to pay for the server"... I really don't understand why you target me specifically with that. And above that, having to pay to be treated fairly has nothing really biblical, even if it's certainly very catholic. =)
@Esvau : Thanks for clarifying the rules, but what about :
1) the bans who were made before the "admin in game" rule was established ? Retroactivity is weird, because it implies that written or not, said or unsaid, a rule applies no matter what. So in fact it remains arbitrary.
2) the case when a friend of an admin complains to the admin via mail or PM (most of my bans were "earned" that way, and I have absolutely no proof that i was not banned just by a request without even a replay being watched. Considerated the quickness of the bans i receive, I guess "Ban Nexes pls Tez" or "Ban GodStrongArms pls Tez" is enough as a reason if it comes from a friend or at least someone Tez doesn't dislike.
3) the case of an admin use a smurf account (Tez does that a lot, ain't he ?), thus making it impossible for players to know. If the admin doesn't want to assume his admin mantle, he shouldn't be allowed to use his admins rights and should go trough the banrequest thread like everyone else.
4) The case of an admin and one or more of his buddies present in same game, and the so called buddy start to provoke you by calling you noob for free, agressively, or trying to systematically kick you from the begin of the game to harass you. Then using your reaction to ban you (without a post or a replay ofc, that's so much easy). Both should then be banned, or no one at all (that's what happened yesterday).
Tez behavior, and the behavior of his buddies requesting via mail, PM, or IM someone to be banned at discretion is an absurdity in a league which works on a so called guideline and banrequest public procedure.
Instead of acknowledging that once and for all and correcting the problem once and for all, you write in the guideline that admins can do whatever they want as long as they are in the game. But obviously, even if they are hidden or worst, not in the game, you can still be banned without further notice. So what's the use of the banrequest thread, or of the guideline, the penality system and so on, if there is no fairness about the way it's enforced ? What's the point of burying your head in the ground ? Do I also have to praise you with honeyed words and try to become your cyber friend, Esvau, so you will finally do as a favor what you should do out of justice and common sense ? Because atm you grand more easily a request made out of irony in a 3 lines and which goes ofc in the wrong direction (despotism and arbitrary) than something which goes in the right one (due process for everyone)...
Esvau, you said you're not made for customer service. Fine by me, but what about putting back on track our little king of Prussia who does anything he pleases to do ? Ain't that in your ability sleeve either ?
I think you guys are in deep psychological trouble about the way you use autority.
@Esvau : Thanks for clarifying the rules, but what about :
1) the bans who were made before the "admin in game" rule was established ? Retroactivity is weird, because it implies that written or not, said or unsaid, a rule applies no matter what. So in fact it remains arbitrary.
2) the case when a friend of an admin complains to the admin via mail or PM (most of my bans were "earned" that way, and I have absolutely no proof that i was not banned just by a request without even a replay being watched. Considerated the quickness of the bans i receive, I guess "Ban Nexes pls Tez" or "Ban GodStrongArms pls Tez" is enough as a reason if it comes from a friend or at least someone Tez doesn't dislike.
3) the case of an admin use a smurf account (Tez does that a lot, ain't he ?), thus making it impossible for players to know. If the admin doesn't want to assume his admin mantle, he shouldn't be allowed to use his admins rights and should go trough the banrequest thread like everyone else.
4) The case of an admin and one or more of his buddies present in same game, and the so called buddy start to provoke you by calling you noob for free, agressively, or trying to systematically kick you from the begin of the game to harass you. Then using your reaction to ban you (without a post or a replay ofc, that's so much easy). Both should then be banned, or no one at all (that's what happened yesterday).
Tez behavior, and the behavior of his buddies requesting via mail, PM, or IM someone to be banned at discretion is an absurdity in a league which works on a so called guideline and banrequest public procedure.
Instead of acknowledging that once and for all and correcting the problem once and for all, you write in the guideline that admins can do whatever they want as long as they are in the game. But obviously, even if they are hidden or worst, not in the game, you can still be banned without further notice. So what's the use of the banrequest thread, or of the guideline, the penality system and so on, if there is no fairness about the way it's enforced ? What's the point of burying your head in the ground ? Do I also have to praise you with honeyed words and try to become your cyber friend, Esvau, so you will finally do as a favor what you should do out of justice and common sense ? Because atm you grand more easily a request made out of irony in a 3 lines and which goes ofc in the wrong direction (despotism and arbitrary) than something which goes in the right one (due process for everyone)...
Esvau, you said you're not made for customer service. Fine by me, but what about putting back on track our little king of Prussia who does anything he pleases to do ? Ain't that in your ability sleeve either ?
I think you guys are in deep psychological trouble about the way you use autority.
:D "you see whole replay and then come back to say please!"
===== FAM_Nexes... To be continued... GodStrongArms, Nexes, Canneton =====
===== FAM_Nexes... To be continued... GodStrongArms, Nexes, Canneton =====
