No, both are wrong.
The one who got banned is banned because of rules. Most of them know there are rules on ranked, but they dont care, so its obvious they are banned.
However, if they were banned is because ranked players report them. When you banned players, you need to know the consequences. Maybe they will come back, maybe not. So if they dont come back, its not only their fault as you are the one who report them.
Consequently its obvious there are less and less players in ranked. And as they dont care about rules, they dont go in ranked anymore.
Conclusion: The problems are rules, and the ranked game system, or maybe simply because ranked games dont fit them once they discovered what is a ranked game .
That means closing temporaly qualify wont change anything.
The one who got banned is banned because of rules. Most of them know there are rules on ranked, but they dont care, so its obvious they are banned.
However, if they were banned is because ranked players report them. When you banned players, you need to know the consequences. Maybe they will come back, maybe not. So if they dont come back, its not only their fault as you are the one who report them.
Consequently its obvious there are less and less players in ranked. And as they dont care about rules, they dont go in ranked anymore.
Conclusion: The problems are rules, and the ranked game system, or maybe simply because ranked games dont fit them once they discovered what is a ranked game .
That means closing temporaly qualify wont change anything.
I AM THE FAKER OF BTANKS ! :D