Continuing from
http://btanks.net/forum/showthread.php?t...1#pid39271 as I was told by Prog that this topic is the same as the other one and started by me (no it wasn't, but never mind):
- With 7 votes this poll is practically useless. 7 People isn't even one full game.
- Going by usernames/btanks accounts, most of the people active in here have played way more games in the past than they do nowadays, and many have been part of a btanks clan and played private games. That contrasts with the fact that for quite some time now there are way more qualify games running than ranked ones, and I dare say (even though I can't know for sure of course) that there are more people playing qualify than anything else (e.g. ranked, privated games, etc). Continuing on this train of thought, I think that people argumenting in here should first play at least 10 qualify games (and no, if you did so 2 years ago it does not count) to be able to talk about the "majority of players". Anyway, I'm currently playing about 20-30 games a week, of which at least 15 are qualify, and not being able to kick someone ruins at least 1 of 3 games, on bad days it's 3 of 3 (like yesterday).
- I've already started uploading replays to show how the kick system constantly fails. Of course, instead of watching the replay or discussing the situation, an admin just closed the thread. Yay. For those of you who prefer the current solution, I suggest doing the same (uploading replays, pointing out the important parts) with counter-examples, e.g. a game where it would have been bad if someone was kickable (including the posted possibility of the enemy being able to vote).
- As the other thread has been closed, I will upload replays here instead to prove my point. I'll try to point out the important stuff as concise and exact as possible, so you would not have to waste your time viewing uninteresting parts of the game.
Cheers
Getting used to the Sand everywhere. At least it brings us map updates.