Posts: 247
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation:
0
A 1250 gold counter to a 3500 item? It's not hard to see how imbalanced that is and how terribly underpowered the bomb would be in this were implemented.
Starcraft II
PandaBearGuy.614
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
8
It would be interesting to make it reduce the bomba damage ^_^
I am so good that I don't even need to type -rc because I never die !
Posts: 1,203
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
8
or maybe just block the countdown for 2 or 3 seconds?
Not yet totally dead, you can find the Team and possibly new and old Players on our new Discord Server. Join by this Instant Invite:
https://discord.gg/FbbGbHj
Posts: 247
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation:
0
Jayzer Wrote:I like this idea. The bomb is expensive because of the damage it does. But the remote fuse is clearly a counter to explosives. It's like saying "a 600 gold net to kill a flyer that's worth 1000 bounty? After 3 charges and kills that's, 3000 gold, that's imba"
I do think the net is a pretty imba item in the late game, which is why I ALWAYS use it against late-game air tanks. :wink:
http://btanks.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=...444#p33444
I'm against this idea, because I don't think it would be balanced to have the reusable/permanent remote fuse counter the one-time use bomb when it costs a fraction of the price. The remote fuse would be way too cost effective/powerful for the bomb to be useful. A bombing player already has to wait a few seconds to plant the bomb and provide enough cover so that his enemies doesn't destroy it before the countdown. If he fails, he loses 3,500 gold in the process. As things are right now, bombs are only useful in niche situations, and implementing this would make those situations even rarer.
Starcraft II
PandaBearGuy.614