Official Battle Tanks Community › Battle Tanks - Warcraft III › Feedback v
Share mode abuse - A player gets unfairly strong.

Poll: What do you think of the "-share" command?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
It should be removed from the game
41.67%
 5 41.67%
I'm fine with it
16.67%
 2 16.67%
I'm fine with it, but a countermeasures against pooling 1 player should be made
33.33%
 4 33.33%
Make it available through ingame voting
8.33%
 1 8.33%
Total 12 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Share mode abuse - A player gets unfairly strong.
RedNova Offline
Member
***
Posts: 97
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 0
#11
2008-02-19, 22:47:27
Why not limit the amount of gold that can be send (let's say 100 * weapon upgrade level) and limit the number of times it can be used PER TEAM (like -kick and -giveup) for a limited period?

Should prove to be easy to code, and ramps up effectively. And it could allow some to send that "300 GOLD for laser" wheiners always ask about...
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Share mode abuse - A player gets unfairly strong. - by RedNova - 2008-02-19, 22:47:27

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  add -votekick player Slaktaren 14 14,719 2015-02-11, 22:19:09
Last Post: hiver
  Player Creeps/Buildings Gold gozo1985 2 4,424 2013-05-24, 20:07:55
Last Post: gozo1985
  4 vs 5 --- 4 Player team imbalanced? StendekX 5 6,385 2010-12-06, 21:58:28
Last Post: mooneye
  [8.68] "-unstuck" after player kick works fine B-Tanker 1 1,890 2010-04-03, 16:53:07
Last Post: B-Tanker
  HB mode End game problem! Twilight_Zone 41 28,514 2009-06-22, 13:44:27
Last Post: Doomhammer112



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)