2010-11-05, 23:42:32
Well, the team with less players usually have disadvantage when they does not overpower the enemy over time. The longer the game lasts, the greater the chance the team with less players will lose. With only 1 leaver the team with 4 players isn't at so much disadvantage and they might have a chance of winning the game if they play well and use the creeping income advantage, but they will lose to a better teamwork.
However you greatly notice of being outnumber when it's 3v5, it's more rare that the team with only 3 players will win cuz lack of angles and being 2 less.
Also the force gold greatly rewards the team with most players, as the team with less player get a little more gold, but with some loss. In 4v5 that isn't so much gold loss.
I would say being less players is usually an disadvantage.
However you greatly notice of being outnumber when it's 3v5, it's more rare that the team with only 3 players will win cuz lack of angles and being 2 less.
Also the force gold greatly rewards the team with most players, as the team with less player get a little more gold, but with some loss. In 4v5 that isn't so much gold loss.
I would say being less players is usually an disadvantage.