(2011-09-11, 08:48:07)EarthR Wrote: like i said dont take the example of currys you have no clue why people want them kicked.I was in one of the games that people -votekicked and ban requested (got disaproved in that instance). They played an unusual (but rather effective) game as a tinker. The mass mob of Tinker haters on their team blamed them for everything.
I am not saying I like or agree with the curry's, but in the game I was in people tried to votekick and ban them purely on emotion and no logic. This is offtopic anyway
4 people who want to kick you does not always mean 4 smart or logical votes, usually 4 emotional votes 90% of the time. If that was not the case, how come once my team REFUSED to kick me with a K:D of 3-13 but tried to kick someone with a K:D of 6-10? Purely because they liked me and not like that poor guy.
As for what else you said, you cannot make assumptions on people with high Assists scores and bad K:D ratios as being bad. Some are bad and some are good. Currently the assist criteria is pathetic if you do all the work for someone It sometimes does not count as an assist. Other times you do 10 damage on someone it will count as an Assists.
The assist criteria needs to change, so it can be used effectively in the Votekick criteria.
(2011-09-11, 16:08:39)Althend Wrote: You just need to touch someone once with a bombard tog et an assist... Assist means shit if u feed ^__^AMEN! the assist criteria NEEDS TO CHANGE