2012-01-12, 18:48:34
(This post was last modified: 2012-01-12, 18:49:27 by Velocity2k.)
(2012-01-12, 18:26:50)nostralias Wrote: My point is that my team was punished for flaming someone that has ruined many many games and you seem very focused on that aspect of the game. Everyone on my team was very frustrated with hasmat.We are talking about one specific game here. I did only see one single game with this guy. And the ban request got accepted. I only agreed with this decision.
(2012-01-12, 18:26:50)nostralias Wrote: But you allow him to continue playing despite the fact that he purposely played without teamplay and then decided to sit in the base until we lost.[sarcasm]Yes, i'm the evil guy allowing bad players to play... We should disallow all bad and all good players, only average allowed![/sarcasm]
Again: Watching the replay it looks like he's just a bad player but he kept doing actions. And yes, he was in the base in the end - but at least he fed less, right? Looks like he thought this would be the best he can do.
Additionally considering he got flamed/insulted during the game and many kick-attempts against him were started, he kept "cool", didn't start to flame/insult against you. That's what has to be considered here too.
If there haven't been flames/insults and kicks against him his actions might have looked different...
And that's also my basic point. Although he was flamed and kickvoted all game long he still kept "nice". Others would start a flamewar in such a situation.
