2012-04-10, 03:51:25
(This post was last modified: 2012-04-10, 03:59:12 by GEN_Schwarzkopf.)
Wow progg, thanks for randomly flaming me! This thread is a discussion about game balance.
If you're going to add to the discussion please read the thread or my post and respond to the idea. If just going to attack a person and not the idea you should not be posting here at all.
You should not have a reputation of 3 if you want to randomly jump into a discussion to tell a league member they are blind and that they sux. This behavior should no longer be tolerated in the forum.
The point I was making is simple:
http://league.btanks.net/game.php?gameid=29493
The medivac on our team (ILDM) was 0-4 in ranked, while the guy with the 2nd lowest ELO on their team (trekki) was 240-238, and their lowest ELO (Alton) was 246-242. Cro-Ownage, also on their team is 368-320, a really good win:loss ratio, yet had an ELO of 1485.
It is baffling how a guy with hundreds or rated games logged with more wins than losses can have the same or less ELO than a guy who is 0-4.
So the only thing I'm getting at is that we may want to have ELO formula use number of games won and win:loss ratio into consideration.
This concept has received some support if you'd read the rest of this thread. It's really a question of implementation.
- Rob
If you're going to add to the discussion please read the thread or my post and respond to the idea. If just going to attack a person and not the idea you should not be posting here at all.
You should not have a reputation of 3 if you want to randomly jump into a discussion to tell a league member they are blind and that they sux. This behavior should no longer be tolerated in the forum.
The point I was making is simple:
http://league.btanks.net/game.php?gameid=29493
The medivac on our team (ILDM) was 0-4 in ranked, while the guy with the 2nd lowest ELO on their team (trekki) was 240-238, and their lowest ELO (Alton) was 246-242. Cro-Ownage, also on their team is 368-320, a really good win:loss ratio, yet had an ELO of 1485.
It is baffling how a guy with hundreds or rated games logged with more wins than losses can have the same or less ELO than a guy who is 0-4.
So the only thing I'm getting at is that we may want to have ELO formula use number of games won and win:loss ratio into consideration.
This concept has received some support if you'd read the rest of this thread. It's really a question of implementation.
- Rob
Former Chieftain of Clan toaf on US EAST *Retired*
Just playing for the fun of it now.
Just playing for the fun of it now.