2007-12-20, 19:18:48
Lol, then it would be even more difficult to track what the newest version is (experienced that with other maps already many times).
No i must say firehelix is right, a fixed update-date is the best way to go. At first, you can choose to set the time between release dates very short (from a week to a month) and you can extend that time the more stable the map becomes. Also, when you have for example 1 map every 2 months, and there is found a major bug, you can always immediatly release another version of the same map. Noone would wine about a new map in between release dates if it is for a major bug.
No i must say firehelix is right, a fixed update-date is the best way to go. At first, you can choose to set the time between release dates very short (from a week to a month) and you can extend that time the more stable the map becomes. Also, when you have for example 1 map every 2 months, and there is found a major bug, you can always immediatly release another version of the same map. Noone would wine about a new map in between release dates if it is for a major bug.