Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My take on HB
#1
The problem with HB mode is that it offers big rewards in a high scoring game. At the start of a typical btanks game getting 2-3 more kills on your lane opponent gives you a moderate lead against your opponent, while in HB mode 2-3 kills would give you a much larger lead over your opponent. HB mode also makes a lot of start starting weapons very redundant which is a rather silly game design choice. Btanks is offering too many options that deviate from the core gameplay.

If people want faster gratification (better tanks and more powerful weapons sooner), keeping everything in HB mode the same as normal mode, but increase the gold gained per second and the xp received from creeps and tanks. This way we won't have such a nightmare balancing problem. Discuss.
Reply
#2
Quote:The problem with HB mode is that it offers big rewards in a high scoring game


That is the whole point of hb. Screw balance - some people just enjoy getting heaps of $$ and xp fast.

Quote:This way we won't have such a nightmare balancing problem.
there is no balancing 'problem'. Hb is imbalanced, as it was meant to be.
Into Alien Crossfire? It has been almost 10 years. Time to update your datalinks.
Try out my Comprehensive Datalinks Update. Now v1.3!
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=291246
Reply
#3
Hi,

HB is fine, keep it like he is !

HB is just unba against noob !!

HB is not faster (game time) in pro game.

Tank built is just different.

When Leaver and i win 3vs5 they say luck, gold leaver etc .. I think that if they would stay i would win too ^^; i just save up more when people on my team leave to keep advance even if i feed at begin.

In pro game 3vs5 = lose 99% cuz Teamplay


Agree ?
Reply
#4
WaRRioR_BrosS Wrote:In pro game 3vs5 = lose 99% cuz Teamplay

and because of more inventory slots and able to have 5tanks (5x titan ulti is very imba)
Anti-HighBounty Alliance has wonBig Grin
[Image: btanksia6.jpg]
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)