2012-03-06, 15:07:13
(2012-03-06, 12:30:10)Max Wrote: Well, for group A this is different. If TBBK would have play, BuG would have done the same thing than what happened in group C (delaying the game for better k/d ratio). That's the game and that's the rules. Otherwise, if we don't count (in group A) the match Boozers vs TBBK, Boozers are still qualified in quarter finals, which make a rematch absurd considering we have played the same time in the games (about 1h+ vs Anal) and still have a better k/d ratio.
I think i made my point
About group C, if they all want a rematch (Oldshool and Oldscotch) then why not do it? Sieg-Geil doesn't need (and doesn't want) to play one anyway, and that changes nothing but maybe give them the 1st rank.
Best regards !
Sorry Max but its not the same.
Because we didnt played at the same time u know? ( BuG vs Anal Round 2)
U guys could calculate the risk of playing against anal in round 3. So the situation was not the same.
I think u should understand what i mean.