2012-03-06, 17:34:05
@progg,
If you are OldSchool, now here are the options:
1. Without doing a rematch, you are ranked 1st.
2. Do the rematch, if you lose, you are out.
3. Do the rematch, if you win, you are ranked 2nd.
Why do you bother to do the rematch?
You said this:
> Since we agreed on two points:
> 1. K-D sux.
> 2. Sieg Geil is qualified anyway.
I agreed on the 1st point, but I disagree on the 2nd point.
The truth is, with K-D rule, both OldSchool and Sieg-GeiL are qualified.
Without K-D rule, OldSchool, Sieg-GeiL and Oldsotch are all qualified, cuz they all have 6p.
So your 2nd description is wrong.
So if we say "K-D sux" and take it out, then we should make rematch for 3 teams.
But now Sieg-GeiL wouldn't risk to do the rematch, so we are trying to step back to see if OldSchool wants a rematch vs. OldScotch.
If the OldSchool really stand out to prove they can win in any case, with or without K-D. We should appreciate and encourage them. Why do you want to punish them to lower down the rank even after a win?
If you are OldSchool, now here are the options:
1. Without doing a rematch, you are ranked 1st.
2. Do the rematch, if you lose, you are out.
3. Do the rematch, if you win, you are ranked 2nd.
Why do you bother to do the rematch?
You said this:
> Since we agreed on two points:
> 1. K-D sux.
> 2. Sieg Geil is qualified anyway.
I agreed on the 1st point, but I disagree on the 2nd point.
The truth is, with K-D rule, both OldSchool and Sieg-GeiL are qualified.
Without K-D rule, OldSchool, Sieg-GeiL and Oldsotch are all qualified, cuz they all have 6p.
So your 2nd description is wrong.
So if we say "K-D sux" and take it out, then we should make rematch for 3 teams.
But now Sieg-GeiL wouldn't risk to do the rematch, so we are trying to step back to see if OldSchool wants a rematch vs. OldScotch.
If the OldSchool really stand out to prove they can win in any case, with or without K-D. We should appreciate and encourage them. Why do you want to punish them to lower down the rank even after a win?