Posts: 1,019
Threads: 24
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
13
TKF Wrote:So in other words people with lousy stay rate must play some games to increase their stay rate to acceptable 80%? So only the points will be resetted right? Don't forget: only the last 20 games count for the join requirement.
If we would reset the bot DB too everybody would have to play at least 10 games to join the ranked bot. I think this would take about 1-2 month to have an acceptable number of players for the ranked bots again  . That's why i don't think we need to reset this DB.
Posts: 1,494
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
5
Any bragging rights for the beta rank 1 with the reset?
Posts: 147
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
1
Wer aufhört, besser zu werden, hat aufgehört, gut zu sein.
I  my Denglisch
Posts: 136
Threads: 20
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
0
what about the current league-bans?
When it comes to me, I hope the bans will be kept, but at another point of view..... the current bans where made in League-Beta...
Der Vorteil an der Klugheit ist, dass man sich dumm stellen kann.
Andersherum ist dies schon erheblich schwieriger.
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
We do not have any intention deleting bans - all banned are banned for a reason  hock:
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 147
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
1
:!: if the league will be reset, then the whole pointsystem should be reworked :!:
zb:if you have a leaver, and you lose, you should get no -points
Wer aufhört, besser zu werden, hat aufgehört, gut zu sein.
I my Denglisch
Posts: 1,019
Threads: 24
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
13
Maybe the oldest bans can be deleted (for example bans older than 3 months, depends on the reason). I think most of these players already made new accounts.
Posts: 147
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
1
daCe Wrote::!: if the league will be reset, then the whole pointsystem should be reworked :!:
zb:if you have a leaver, and you lose, you should get no -points
:!: :!: :!:
Wer aufhört, besser zu werden, hat aufgehört, gut zu sein.
I my Denglisch
Posts: 209
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
daCe Wrote:daCe Wrote::!: if the league will be reset, then the whole pointsystem should be reworked :!:
zb:if you have a leaver, and you lose, you should get no -points
:!: :!: :!: then, 90% of all games would not going to be in the league...
Posts: 2,503
Threads: 205
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
17
I deleted your last post daCe, I suggest you write more constructive posts in the future.
This post has been brought to you by Sand - it's everywhere, get used to it.
Posts: 1,019
Threads: 24
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
13
And not counting leavergames wouldn't be a good option. Many games wouldn't be counted then. I'm not sure if it's 90% but i guess it's very close to that. And another problem: disconnects. You can't distinguish between a disconnect and a leave.
Posts: 147
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
1
sorry :oops:
Wer aufhört, besser zu werden, hat aufgehört, gut zu sein.
I my Denglisch
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
We've change our asumed stay percentage for player with less than 20 games.
It's now 90% stay instead of 75% - this will reduce penalty gain if you have less than 20 ranked games.
Penalty will be calculated depending on someone stay percentage of the last 19 games + current game. If someone do not have enough games the penalty calculation will fill up those missing games with that asumed stay percentage.
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 2,292
Threads: 181
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation:
2
Wasn't it supposed to be increased to 85%? 90% is to much for my unstable connection.
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
TKF Wrote:Wasn't it supposed to be increased to 85%? 90% is to much for my unstable connection.
It's just penalty calculation. That differs from requirement to play ranked games 
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
Fixed another penalty calculation concerning less than 20 games hock:
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
|
![[Image: ugly.gif]](http://starcraft2.ingame.de/forum/images/smilies/ugly.gif)
