2011-08-26, 18:09:31
(This post was last modified: 2011-08-26, 18:10:41 by UnifiedDoom.)
From what I've seen the team with the 2 player difference would lose regardless of whether or not the 2 players stayed or left in the first place. Most of the time 3v5 matches happen when "feeders" or afkers are kicked by their own team. There is the rare occasion when a good player drop's or leaves for personal reasons; however, the 3v5 situation is 99% of the time self-inflicted by the team of 3. This means they would just lose simply because the feeder/afker is on their team due to the "balancing" at the beginning regardless of whether they kick them or not. Adding an incentive to create 3v5 situations in which losing would yield no penalty would just lead to more unjust kicks. If I were in that situation I would simply try to make all of my games 3v5 since I have on occasion won those games and losing would not affect my rank at all see how broken that is?