2012-02-28, 15:50:35
(2012-02-28, 15:02:35)LIoOoOoIL Wrote: worst case, all opponents of a team didnt showup (even in the final), nobody gets a winner prize? ; D
just count everywin like this(didnt showup etc.), for all members of such teams, its not their fault.
The BTT tournament is made to present good team playing games, not only for the win.
Also, because the semi-final and final will be BO3, if a team goes to the top, they should already have 4 wins (if all game happens). And i don't even mention the 1/4 final game + 3 group games.
So to speak, for the 1st team members, it is really not difficult to play and contribute at least 2 wins for the team.
looool, in your worst case example, if a team ends up in 1st and all by default win to get there, it means the tournament is so fail that we shouldn't make it at all. In this case, would you be happy to recieve such a "prize" from a fail tournament? It would be a shame for me.
Anyway, the rule "at least 2 wins for the team to receive the prize" is defined to prevent the 5th player don't play, but the other 4 players too strong.
For example, if a poor skilled player like saltwater doesn't play for all games, but because his other 4 teammates like fire, althend etc. are too strong, and salt's team gets to the 1st at the end. In this case, it won't be fair to give salt the winner prize.
(it is just a joking example salt, and you know we like you xD)