Sudden Death - Printable Version

Sudden Death - Printable Version

+- Official Battle Tanks Community (https://btanks.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Battle Tanks - Warcraft III (https://btanks.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://btanks.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Sudden Death (/showthread.php?tid=727)

Pages: 1 2

Sudden Death - jonjon - 2010-02-15

This has probably been suggested before but this game should have a sudden death that can be implemented at the start of the game through a command.

For instance -death 90 will do sudden death at 1 hour 30 minutes. When Sudden Death occurs, tanks that die become observers and cannot respawn. The last team standing wins or the team that destroys enemy base wins.

Re: Sudden Death - lyf590 - 2010-02-15

ooo i like this idea lol, probably the best suggestion in a while
id say go for it ^^

Re: Sudden Death - horselance - 2010-02-15

:!: I dont like this idea jonjon:

But i like Sudden Death.

Re: Sudden Death - Paladon - 2010-02-15

That actually sounds very interesting, an idea definitely worth a thought.

Re: Sudden Death - Scelle - 2010-02-15

Ähm, and when there are only 2 tanks left and they kill each other?

Re: Sudden Death - Prog - 2010-02-15

The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.

Re: Sudden Death - Althend - 2010-02-15

Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.

Totally.

The current game has enough trouble with camping ^_^

I would rather put an increasing cooldown when tanks die.... x2 first... x3 after... increasing trough time.

Re: Sudden Death - horselance - 2010-02-15

Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.

I thinked about this too, defender will get the advantage possibly. But who cares, its a mode, play with a certain tactic depending to mode. And even you camp, some1 will always die in some battle and game will end very soon after. (I dont say camper wont get advantage but i say it wont take much time to end game, and after some1 dies it will be 4v5 and 5 ppl probably win for sure)

Re: Sudden Death - jonjon - 2010-02-16

horselance Wrote::!: I dont like this idea jonjon:

Quote:Bring back old Death Magic.

But i like Sudden Death.

:twisted: Haha, I love the old death magic. It wasn't even that good because it gave too much warning to retreat when it had a faster cool down. Also the purchase was extremely risky being 7777. When they upgraded it to do 1000 dmg per hit, the strategy changed. First it was strong, then too strong and now too weak.

Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.

At least with Sudden Death team work is increased. It also opens a new area of strategic play. I can imagine Goblin Shredder forcing people out of control points, sieges and creeps luring opponents out, more people buying invis, breakers stopping tanks being too aggressive, nets, mines, explosives, factories being dropped, strongest tanks being ganged by 5 people. And that's just the start of it.

At this point, it is not the strongest that matters. It's who can implement a better team strategy.

Re: Sudden Death - LivingFR - 2010-02-16

i like the idea much too.
It's just not as every game is played as Sudden Death, but you could do it just some time to have one more variety.
Everything what makes the game bigger in complexibility makes it more playable in longer view.
Of course, there are aswell some negative sideaspects, but I personally think nearly no one like the overlong games which least 2hours+, and this feature could just give the whole game a climax at the end which make you have the most fun and "nervousness" in the late game. As a consequence of this could make people in publich games maybe even more motivated to stay until the end, because they dont want to miss the best part.
And I absolutely agree to jonjon.

Re: Sudden Death - Battlemaniac - 2010-02-16

i think this Sudden Death mode will go great with the existing CV mode Smile

both goes kinda side by side

Re: Sudden Death - Saiyuki - 2010-02-16

Battlemaniac Wrote:i think this Sudden Death mode will go great with the existing CV mode

both goes kinda side by side

you mean, players may purely defend base and cptp to attacked cp's? ^^

Re: Sudden Death - Dr.xD - 2010-03-19

The Sudden Death mode should restrict lifes(repawns) of the team or per player. *Real* Sudden Death would suck... So it would be ok to limit respawns to 3/5 per player or 15/20/25 per team after x (90) mins or something like that... The death of the last enemy player should trigger the end screen/blow up the enemy main (which/that should make the killer of the last enemy guy invulnerable) to prevent a draw.

Re: Sudden Death - Tom-Ace - 2010-03-19

I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps.

Re: Sudden Death - eSVau - 2010-03-20

Tom-Ace Wrote:I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps.

tickets, sounds more interesting to me than conquest victory or sudden death Smile

Re: Sudden Death - Exodus - 2010-03-20

Tom-Ace Wrote:I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps.

This could be easily fixed, by changing the winning condition to reach a certain amount of kills. This way you have to play aggressivly to win and not just sit in your base and wait for your opponents to make any mistakes or get impatient.

Re: Sudden Death - Dr.xD - 2010-03-20

Quote:winning condition to reach a certain amount of kills

Thats called (a) Deathmatch...I thought that this thread was about a Sudden Death mode for bt... But a Deathmatch mode isnt bad either :wink: .

Re: Sudden Death - horselance - 2010-03-26

I support both Sudden Death and Deathmatch. Very good ideas.

Re: Sudden Death - Orthodox - 2010-04-11

This would be very interesting.... Deathmatch! Like said before, that would be a great chance to get all those campers out of their homes Big Grin

Maybe set a line up to : the team wins first have to get 100 Kills :wink: , or destroy enemies base Smile

That would look fine, if the enemies- base would be destroyed, but you have to keep on fighting until your 100 kills :lol: ( just kidding)

Re: Sudden Death - Althend - 2010-04-11

Orthodox Wrote:This would be very interesting.... Deathmatch! Like said before, that would be a great chance to get all those campers out of their homes

Maybe set a line up to : the team wins first have to get 100 Kills :wink: , or destroy enemies base

That would look fine, if the enemies- base would be destroyed, but you have to keep on fighting until your 100 kills :lol: ( just kidding)

I dont see why deathmatch would counter camping. It would make camping more important.