Posts: 100
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
This has probably been suggested before but this game should have a sudden death that can be implemented at the start of the game through a command.
For instance -death 90 will do sudden death at 1 hour 30 minutes. When Sudden Death occurs, tanks that die become observers and cannot respawn. The last team standing wins or the team that destroys enemy base wins.
Bring back old Death Magic.
---
Beating rookies makes you a regular.
Beating regulars makes you a pro.
Beating pros makes you an authority.
Posts: 65
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation:
0
ooo i like this idea lol, probably the best suggestion in a while
id say go for it ^^
Posts: 802
Threads: 41
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
:!: I dont like this idea jonjon:
 But i like Sudden Death.
Trolololo
Posts: 928
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation:
0
That actually sounds very interesting, an idea definitely worth a thought.
Posts: 23
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation:
0
Ähm, and when there are only 2 tanks left and they kill each other?
Posts: 1,494
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
5
The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
8
Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.
Totally.
The current game has enough trouble with camping ^_^
I would rather put an increasing cooldown when tanks die.... x2 first... x3 after... increasing trough time.
I am so good that I don't even need to type -rc because I never die !
Posts: 802
Threads: 41
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents.
I thinked about this too, defender will get the advantage possibly. But who cares, its a mode, play with a certain tactic depending to mode. And even you camp, some1 will always die in some battle and game will end very soon after. (I dont say camper wont get advantage but i say it wont take much time to end game, and after some1 dies it will be 4v5 and 5 ppl probably win for sure)
Trolololo
Posts: 100
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
horselance Wrote::!: I dont like this idea jonjon:
But i like Sudden Death.
:twisted: Haha, I love the old death magic. It wasn't even that good because it gave too much warning to retreat when it had a faster cool down. Also the purchase was extremely risky being 7777. When they upgraded it to do 1000 dmg per hit, the strategy changed. First it was strong, then too strong and now too weak.
Prog Wrote:The question is: Who would ever attack after sudden death? I'd just camp in the base, waiting for the opponents. At least with Sudden Death team work is increased. It also opens a new area of strategic play. I can imagine Goblin Shredder forcing people out of control points, sieges and creeps luring opponents out, more people buying invis, breakers stopping tanks being too aggressive, nets, mines, explosives, factories being dropped, strongest tanks being ganged by 5 people. And that's just the start of it.
At this point, it is not the strongest that matters. It's who can implement a better team strategy.
Bring back old Death Magic.
---
Beating rookies makes you a regular.
Beating regulars makes you a pro.
Beating pros makes you an authority.
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
0
i like the idea much too.
It's just not as every game is played as Sudden Death, but you could do it just some time to have one more variety.
Everything what makes the game bigger in complexibility makes it more playable in longer view.
Of course, there are aswell some negative sideaspects, but I personally think nearly no one like the overlong games which least 2hours+, and this feature could just give the whole game a climax at the end which make you have the most fun and "nervousness" in the late game. As a consequence of this could make people in publich games maybe even more motivated to stay until the end, because they dont want to miss the best part.
And I absolutely agree to jonjon.
Posts: 135
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
0
i think this Sudden Death mode will go great with the existing CV mode
both goes kinda side by side
Posts: 1,203
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
8
Battlemaniac Wrote:i think this Sudden Death mode will go great with the existing CV mode
both goes kinda side by side you mean, players may purely defend base and cptp to attacked cp's? ^^
Not yet totally dead, you can find the Team and possibly new and old Players on our new Discord Server. Join by this Instant Invite: https://discord.gg/FbbGbHj
Posts: 31
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
The Sudden Death mode should restrict lifes(repawns) of the team or per player. *Real* Sudden Death would suck... So it would be ok to limit respawns to 3/5 per player or 15/20/25 per team after x (90) mins or something like that... The death of the last enemy player should trigger the end screen/blow up the enemy main (which/that should make the killer of the last enemy guy invulnerable) to prevent a draw.
Posts: 146
Threads: 15
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
0
I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps.
Oh, Death, оh Death, oh Death,
No wealth, no ruin, no silver, no gold
Nothing satisfies me but your soul
Oh, Death,
Well I am Death, none can excel,
I'll open the door to heaven or hell.
Oh, Death, оh Death,
my name is Death and the end ïs here...
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
Tom-Ace Wrote:I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps.
tickets, sounds more interesting to me than conquest victory or sudden death
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 2,503
Threads: 205
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
17
Tom-Ace Wrote:I would like a mode that each team has x# of lives and first team to lose all lives will lose! There would have to be a fixed time to play and balance because no one wants a 30 min game of people sitting at cps. This could be easily fixed, by changing the winning condition to reach a certain amount of kills. This way you have to play aggressivly to win and not just sit in your base and wait for your opponents to make any mistakes or get impatient.
This post has been brought to you by Sand - it's everywhere, get used to it.
Posts: 31
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
Quote:winning condition to reach a certain amount of kills
Thats called (a) Deathmatch...I thought that this thread was about a Sudden Death mode for bt... But a Deathmatch mode isnt bad either :wink: .
Posts: 802
Threads: 41
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
I support both Sudden Death and Deathmatch. Very good ideas.
Trolololo
Posts: 136
Threads: 20
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
0
This would be very interesting.... Deathmatch! Like said before, that would be a great chance to get all those campers out of their homes 
Maybe set a line up to : the team wins first have to get 100 Kills :wink: , or destroy enemies base
That would look fine, if the enemies- base would be destroyed, but you have to keep on fighting until your 100 kills :lol: ( just kidding)
Der Vorteil an der Klugheit ist, dass man sich dumm stellen kann.
Andersherum ist dies schon erheblich schwieriger.
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
8
Orthodox Wrote:This would be very interesting.... Deathmatch! Like said before, that would be a great chance to get all those campers out of their homes
Maybe set a line up to : the team wins first have to get 100 Kills :wink: , or destroy enemies base
That would look fine, if the enemies- base would be destroyed, but you have to keep on fighting until your 100 kills :lol: ( just kidding)
I dont see why deathmatch would counter camping. It would make camping more important.
I am so good that I don't even need to type -rc because I never die !
|
