Posts: 55
Threads: 12
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
I dont know if it existed but sometimes one guy with very low elo unbalanced the hole game. I think you should have an elo of 1450 to play ranked.
In qualy you can get max 1470 if you win a game.
Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
2011-12-29, 14:46:38
(This post was last modified: 2011-12-29, 19:12:38 by eSVau.)
There is no ELO for qualify games and a limited ranked bot (1505+) was used two times in three month.
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 363
Threads: 24
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
5
The idea is very good. Ultra low elo guys fuck ups the balace hard.
There's no need to create new bot.
Just add new thing to be able to play ranked.
- 15 games playerd
- 85% stay rate
- 1450 ELO
For guys with ELO - means they already played league, but lower than 1450 -make every quali game + 0.5 ELO. That shouldn't be hard to implement and i think it would increase league games quality.
Posts: 332
Threads: 44
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
4
It wouldn't change anything, because then you could create a new account, play 15 ranked games, and then play ranked.
Biggest problem is that elo just doesn't mean much because it wasn't made for team games. At the time of writing this my elo is under 1500, and still I'm 100% sure I can beat everyone who has only played 15 games in his life hands down.
(2011-12-29, 19:30:08)progg Wrote: The idea is very good. Ultra low elo guys fuck ups the balace hard.
There's no need to create new bot.
Just add new thing to be able to play ranked.
- 15 games playerd
- 85% stay rate
- 1450 ELO
For guys with ELO - means they already played league, but lower than 1450 -make every quali game + 0.5 ELO. That shouldn't be hard to implement and i think it would increase league games quality.
Getting used to the Sand everywhere. At least it brings us map updates.
Posts: 304
Threads: 10
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
2
ok but imagine there are teams about 8k ELO summary and guy 1350 elo come to game. Its certain he will get kicked and his team get extra gold...
Posts: 363
Threads: 24
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
5
8k is big, but a 7,65 elo team and above with 1450 is 90% kick and team of pros with leaver gold. Guys with 1400 elo makes games more imba than lol or wupti.
Posts: 304
Threads: 10
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
2
yea and the problem is kicking them to play qualify doesnt solve a problem they can back ranked even same day...
Posts: 1,494
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
5
The problem is first and foremost kicking them in the league games. I really despise those players who feel the need to kick worse teammates.
Posts: 363
Threads: 24
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
5
Prog
tell me, what for keeping guy with 1-20 in 30minutes having 2k hp tier 1 tank with lvl 8?
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
8
I am so good that I don't even need to type -rc because I never die !
Posts: 363
Threads: 24
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
5
2012-01-02, 17:43:48
(This post was last modified: 2012-01-02, 17:46:24 by progg.)
Well you should ask this quiestion to developers who implemented -kick command.
You're in devteam, not me.
For me it's simple choice - if i think leaver gold would do better for the team than a player i choose leaver gold.
Althend: 100% right.
Btw: i think low apm should be qualified as denial of playing.
edit:
Prog, continuing your question one may ask why should anyone play quali.