Shared Bounty Kills - Good idea?

[scron2]

I fucking love seeing all these people say they don't want a shared bounty.
ON TOP OF THAT --> the guy originally posting describes 3-4 STUPID ways of doing it...
which begs the question, is he just posting this to get it shot down?

OOOOH but he can't say "make it like DOTA" because noooo we don't like DOTA.

In essence, the "5-min-noob-gold" accounts for the creeps killing things worth bounty.
So what everyone here is inherently opposing is the 5-min-noob-gold they get every game.
The point here is that if a hero tank dies to some creeps, whichever hero hit it last should
get the bounty for it and if no hero has attacked it since death, then evenly split it and
instantaneously pay it out. Same for towers, rax etc....
BUT NOT THE CREEPS! (I thought this would have been obvious to everyone reading this!!)

But then we get back to the creeps killing creeps and shared bounties happening there....
and you read sooo many posts about how THAT is unfair:

GooglyBoogly wrote:
As long as the overall bounty remains the same I am all for it. But I don't want to see shared bounty providing extra gold overall.

Sorry, it already does! (5-min-noob-gold)

TKF wrote:
I also see the disadvantages Prog points out. It reduces the reward for player skill

This is indirectly pointing at the fact that IT ALREADY HAPPENS -- (5-min-noob-gold)