Catapult should be able to target air with artillery.

[scron2]

Seriously now, arguments should not be going down this path, especially when I'm talking to none of the map developers in this topic. And if they were I'm sure they wouldn't be saying those things.

PLEEEEEEEAAAAAASE can some1 of the mapper/dev team say something so he stops using such arguments which are just as stupid as the rest of his replies ............

kheg: If you have development skills, please let us know this. Confirm whether or not this change is doable and quote an amount of time required to change it. I bet you can do neither because you don't know what you're talking about at all. You have no reason to disagree with this change otherwise. It's a balanced reasonable suggestion and I know that if Titan can stun both, it implies that you can change the catapult shot to do the same. And that is NOT UNREASONABLE TO ASSUME.

Congrats youre very right I dont know anything. So what now? Do you think just because Im not a mapper I cant evaluate how specific things operate?
To answer your post I would consider some kind of line damage added to that skill which triggers air only and which would have like 50 range less than the skill range.
Of course I guess one should also check if possible that the skill can just do either line damage OR "ground" damage as it wouldnt make any sense to hit an air unit and still hit the targeted area on the ground.
One additional consideration would be necessary which would be the possibility to hit enemy air creeps and if this would be triggered too or not.
So I will quote myself to say AGAIN something i already mentioned:

Cant you realize that youre the only one who thinks that this should be changed right now?
We know your reasons but we (the BT community) don't think its just. So please .. you are free to write but we are free to ignore you if you keep on going like you do at the moment.
THIS JUST WONT BE CHANGED RIGHT NOW! .. Got it?
It is a good suggestion if some1 is very bored BUT atm noone is so..

Hope you can live with that

best regards
khEg

P.S.

and it seems like they are clawing away at it frantically for no reason other than the fact that I'm new here. What an uninviting community, biased.

This is not true.

So kheg admits to posting spam and blatent argument without content or anything to back it up whatsoever. Way to go. I don't think debating this with you is worth it anymore. Please leave this topic now kheg, you are cluttering up the topic.

As for Andibert:
Balancing - with comparison to hunter's smoke (change to air and ground) and Demon tank's old decrepify, this change is hardly as impacting as changing what these abilities could hit. It's a balanced suggestion. You calling it unbalanced because it's "imba" says nothing because later game tanks like titan have that kind of a stun that is 10x better... apparently you don't see a problem with that? Is it not "diverse enough for you"? Does that stun need a nerf too? Think about it.

Realism - once again a flying object hitting a flying object. Nice use of the word usually. There is no "realism argument here" if you read the topic, and if you were smart enough you wouldn't mention it at all.

Diversity: Why is that important? It's a low-level tank that won't see any more action past level 10 at best. Buffing it slightly to make it better is not going to hurt diversity. If anything it adds more diversity because it can do more. And it is balanced so it doesn't hurt what you hold so dearly and vaguely as diversity.