2011-04-20, 10:07:51
(2011-04-20, 07:21:46)LIoOoOoIL Wrote: i also dont think its that fair, to decrease the Points of players, just cause they arent that activ. There can be many reasons for(!)... and why deacrease it?
Points are showing your elo(skill?!..) and if u/or not got penaltys. So why also raise it down, just cause u arent playing... the rank "should" show your truely degree in this League Ladder, or not?
Its not possible to do it perfect for everyone anyway, at all u guys doing a good job, so thx for that.
PS: my last 2 games, win +3.47 loose -11.29 P.
Your skill is measured by elo, your rank by points and your points by ELO+penalty+activity. elo will only touched by playing.
top elo players are far above the average player so the can't gain much but elo is a relativ system anyway, such a player would be at top with 1 point or 100000 points per game or total doesn't matter, its a relativ system.
Oh and a side note, second/third/whatever account decreases the mean value of those who stuck to their account. If all would stuck to thair account mean would be 1500 since it's almost a zero sum, what someone wins anotherone loses. A new account of someone already above all others robs them and lowers the mean.
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline