2012-01-25, 01:38:51
(This post was last modified: 2012-01-25, 01:39:42 by UnifiedDoom.)
(2012-01-24, 16:27:35)eSVau Wrote: only team votes - community complains
This in my opinion is the best solution. Now we need to solve how to figure out when somebody should be kickable. Now the ideal solution would simply to have a neutral party with sound judgement, a referee or admin, to determine when a kick is justified followed by a team vote. Since this is impractical we need to come up with a system that is not abusable and can be picked up by an AI. Because enemy team votes, and allowing a vote 100% of the time as long as 4 players go along are both easily abusable these are out of the question.
Right now I feel as though people are too hard to kick. Because games are so liable to be "ruined" by the presense of players that are simply put, unfit for playing ranked games. Now you may call me bias by asking "well who says who should be able to play ranked and who shouldn't."
I think the solution is this, double the qualification games required for playing ranked to 30 or perhaps even higher. This will actually solve 3 problems in one move.
- Less "noobs" will join ranked games and when they join they will be more experienced lessening the need for a kick command in the first place
- Making the "punishment" for being banned more severe creating an even larger incentive to follow the rules
- Discourage multi-accounting which right now is completely ruining the balance of half of the league ranked games