Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Re-classifying qualify vs ranked games
#6
You also have to acknowledge the current player base. Forcing people to play their appropriate skill-level games might have worked 2 years ago, but there are less wc3 players in general and battle tanks players specificly around nowadays. Splitting this limited player-pool into too many categories destroys the complete playing experience. Who wants to wait 20+ minutes for a random league game? If I'd have to search the wc3 or sc2 1on1 ladder 20 minutes to start a game, I won't play that game ever and it is the same with battle tanks. League would be dead.

The better way to go ist to just have the current split (qualify/ranked) to establish 1) that completely new players are not put into an overly competitive environment; 2) that we can provide ranked games with a low amount of leavers and reasonable team-balance; and 3) create an incentive to play with a point ranking.
Over and above those points supporting the arranged team games helps keeping the game alive, but that relies on the players as well (especially those who put a lot of time into it, like olivercamel with the BTT, but also all those who just keep the bt-clans alive and active).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Re-classifying qualify vs ranked games - by Prog - 2012-02-16, 15:52:44

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Qualify Max 0 2,590 2015-02-20, 11:06:49
Last Post: Max
  Qualify (ranked?) game mode Max 1 3,659 2014-04-16, 21:53:51
Last Post: RaptorXI
  Long games - Supercell ; Titan Max 2 4,114 2014-03-28, 16:58:19
Last Post: Max
  ideas for faster games ckibibi 5 5,115 2014-02-04, 20:48:43
Last Post: eSVau
  Players ruining games psycodiver 3 3,870 2013-12-24, 04:41:25
Last Post: gozo1985



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)