(2011-03-04, 14:23:46)Exodus Wrote: For instance, I could reduce the overall range of the long range weapons to 1200, while still keeping the formula intact (which results in more damage).Oh hell no!
Gameplay is already biased towards overused, overated 1k ranged. People just dont care and/or forget the fact that 1k range are the worst value for money. Most of the people that hate LR are people that get owned by LR, or find themselves in ruined games by noobs that feed with LR (but noobs will feed with any weapon range regardless).
I don't mind you adding additional 1200 range weapons, just as long as you don't remove or change beloved/behated 1300 ranged weapons that has been with battle tanks since the dawn of mankind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. What did you like about the recent development of BT?
Mass converter buff, finally it is a plausible item (it still kinda sucks, but at least now it is half worth the investment)
2. and what didn't you like about it?
Deflective armour biasing late game even more towards the overused supercell. As well as Deflective armor biasing late game away from the underused physo-laser.
3. Which part of the game feels like the most fun for you?
T3 stage. Weapon and tank choices are at an all time high between T2 and T3.
4. and which part don't you like at all?
T4 stage of the game sucks. Just no diversity whatsoever. Lack of late game tanks and lack of HP upgrading items make it a 3 tank challenge. Even worse there is a lack of late game weapons. In particular 777 range, 550 range, 888 Range and 1300 range
5. What should be added/changed over the next versions?
More late weapons with varied ranges, more late tanks, high HP items to allow T3 tanks a chance to be used as T4 Tanks