2008-08-11, 13:04:17
bangyouredead Wrote:Prog Wrote:When you're writing a post you got below the text box a button named (in german) "Dateianhang hochladen". I'll watch it and comment on it. (Btw, getting Titan in 3v3 against sf is a mistake, becouse you need the stuns. Of course it's easy to get owned if you just have one tank which can stun, the sfs just need to use their ulti on this one, the other tanks can't stop them (no stun). In bt it's not like "the most expensive tank is allways in every situation the best tank".)
Well sorry inter, I don't keep very many replays. I suppose everyone here is lying and the SF is actually a balanced tank...come on...As far as the rest of what you wrote, it often happens that people get split up in the endgame. If you have SFs and take the sides then unless youre right on the base that's way out of tp range, and someone has to stop you. Then it's 1v1/2v2 whatever and youre screwed, always...unless of course you have a SF. You said getting a titan against a SF is a mistake which is kind of laughable...like saying infernal is a bad choice against air tank. Of course different tanks have different abilities and some work better against others, as well as complimenting your own teammates...howevever, a tank that costs 9,000 more gold and 11,700 gold in extra upgrades should probably be better. That's 20,700 extra gold...use some common sense.
1.
Quote: I suppose everyone here is lying and the SF is actually a balanced tank...come on...Nice polemic start, doesn't have anything to do with the actual topic (actually there are not that many people claiming that the sf is overpowered, but the ones who are "make quite some noise"). Other players said to me I shouldn't argue with(even reply to) you - as you're getting to a quite polemic level they might be right - oh, do I become polemic too? Refering to a group of people is quite dangerous generally: If there are 100 random people which you don't know and 1 medic, whom will you believe in a question about your health? The 100 random guys as you can't suppose everyone of them is false?
2.
Why should anything that costs more be necesserily stronger, regardless of tactical questions? Bt isn't and shouldn't be that easy.
3.
Quote:As far as the rest of what you wrote, it often happens that people get split up in the endgame. If you have SFs and take the sides then unless youre right on the base that's way out of tp range, and someone has to stop you. Then it's 1v1/2v2 whatever and youre screwed, always...unless of course you have a SF.Well, basically you're wrong. Until the very late game (~2 hours+) one inf can handle a sf at the cp alone. Afterwards 2 infs can use some sort of easy strat: one uses cp-porter, the other one waits ~3 sec and cp ports then, when the sky fortress will allready be using his ultimate. Then it's quite easy to stun (/kill) him. And if you're in offense right now, then the sf can take the cp but you'll jump with (for example) 5 infs into their main base, killing everything. (In such a long game it's anyway just about the main-base kick at the end)