2011-02-24, 12:59:29
Well it's also not the bots fault - it's the network somewhere in between
hock:
Removing games was not planned und removing whole games or just penalty is not as easy as it may look - we need to query more than 40 values for a single game, by hand!
Also depends ELO on its chronological order. ELO is based on its previos rating - changing it would mean that all following games are wrong, even should have another ELO rating resulted into other teams (auto balance). Therefore i really dislike the idea of deleting games.
Removing penalty has no huge impact - it's just quite annoying to do by hand

Removing games was not planned und removing whole games or just penalty is not as easy as it may look - we need to query more than 40 values for a single game, by hand!
Also depends ELO on its chronological order. ELO is based on its previos rating - changing it would mean that all following games are wrong, even should have another ELO rating resulted into other teams (auto balance). Therefore i really dislike the idea of deleting games.
Removing penalty has no huge impact - it's just quite annoying to do by hand

Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline