Posts: 1,297
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
16
We are thinking about how many qualify games should be made (at least) before being allowed to play ranked games.
Marvin Wrote:The first ten million years were the worst and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline
Posts: 209
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
10 to 15 is okay. Most players will get better at 50+, not earlier.
Posts: 593
Threads: 110
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
13
I vote 20. So the players could take care more about their reputation to avoid getting banned, because remake a new account and come back to league becomes harder.
Posts: 485
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
6
like oli says + the skill and gameknowledge would grow up a bit more with 20 as with 10 games, so the ranked games would have a higher quality.
Gustave Le Bon "... Die Einseitigkeit und Überschwänglichkeit der Gefühle der Massen bewahren sie vor Zweifel und Ungewissheit. Den Frauen gleich gehen sie sofort bis zum Äußersten. ...".
Posts: 2,292
Threads: 181
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation:
2
I would say 15 or 20 games, 10 games isn't that much if you are a notorius player you make new accounts.
Posts: 605
Threads: 8
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
1
after some ranked games there are still guys who ask: "what should i buy next?" or "where is the shop for hull?"
i vote for 20
Posts: 1,019
Threads: 24
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
13
In a first step i've changed it to 15 games. Let's see how it works out.