Hi im writing in response to a game yesterday. From the beginning we were only 3 against 5. We dominated the other team, I, for example, had stats 18 to 6. Then they started to conquer two cps at once. We were only 3, so we went to the one cp and then we had no chance to go to the other one because it takes 3 secs to teleport and the were three guys there so time was reduced by one second. So I think that if one team has less players than the other, you shouldnt get time bonus while capturing a cp with more players, especially because the other team can't have this bounus, because they aren't many players, and they can't react as good as the team with 5 members. In the past it was easier to manage cp's with only 3 players in the team.
Yes this is an interesting the subject, since in 3v5 situations the 5 might have the outnumber advantage.
Would be interesting handicap to give a team with less players less tp time. Maybe 0.5 sec pr less player vs the other team. However it might give the team with 4 players vs 5 players maybe a big advantage.
3 vs 5 would be still impossible with reduced cptp casttime. Just giveup asap and hope for a new game without leaver/discs - I don't see any way to make 3 vs 5 a fun and balanced experience.
Once i played 2v4 which was pretty interesting though just thank to skilled teammate while they were 4 against 2 they couldnt use advantage in a right way
