Posts: 401
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
0
So.. no-one actually read the prompt until after they had voted, except for yourself.
Sounds like the voting is working just fine - nothing we can do will stop stupidity.
Posts: 350
Threads: 19
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
Dr.McNinja Wrote:Agreed.. It seems fine most of the time. One game with friends on my team, host was feeding and i -kick 1 as a joke and the other team didnt get it (obviously). It was bot so he just .end 1 and it was just hilarious. It wasnt far into the game so its no prob. I didnt even get enough time to laugh at the other team
lol
Strange but last time when we kick host(if he is critically afk or just a damn bastard) game doesn't end, just someone else takes host precedence. Dunno however how wc3 works in that way...
And Thou shalt trust... The Seer.
Що, блядь, навчився читати українською?
Гнойный буйволизм, товарищи, - это ГБ!
Posts: 401
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
0
That only works if there is someone else playing who can host, if everyone else has their firewalls up the game will end.
Posts: 350
Threads: 19
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
GooglyBoogly Wrote:That only works if there is someone else playing who can host, if everyone else has their firewalls up the game will end.
1. The main reason why someone cannot host is lack of real IP address making clients who tries to connect unable to find route to NATed host. Firewalling is the second problem but I don't think everyone is crazy/stupid enough to close all that stuff on FW that will make him unable to host games in WC3.
2. I don't want to confuse anyone but AFAIK lack of real IP does not disable an ability to maintain a game as a host when it is already started: clients already know route to you and connection is already initiated so they do need to initiate connection and seek that route.
And Thou shalt trust... The Seer.
Що, блядь, навчився читати українською?
Гнойный буйволизм, товарищи, - это ГБ!
